Below we publish a copy of the letter we have sent to Kofi
Annan Secretary General of the United Nations and to the Security Coucil
members of the UN.
Grave
misgivings about the trial of Mr Slobodan Milosevic
7th March 2004.
Dear Sir,
Re: The Trial of Mr Slobodan Milosevic at the ICTY in The Hague.
It is with deep concern that we write to express our grave misgivings
about the current trial of Mr Slobodan Milosevic as conducted by the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).
We understand that the defendant has been given a mere three months to
prepare the case for his defence and furthermore that the witnesses he
wishes to call upon will be subjected to the discretion of the tribunal
itself. This is in stark contrast to the many years and unlimited finance
that was at the disposal of the prosecution for the preparation of its
case and the permission it received to add to its list of witnesses on
almost a day to day basis throughout the last two years. Clearly the legal
requirement for an ‘equality of arms’ between the prosecution
and defence is absent from these proceedings.
Legal observers of the trial have commented that the ICTY creates its
own rules and regulations, which alarmingly have been amended no less
that twenty-eight times during the course of the prosecution case, and
that the tribunal is subject to no external regulatory body. In the interests
of justice ‘being seen to be done’ this is clearly unacceptable.
Moreover the imposition of the three-month time limit allows no consideration
for the poor health condition of the defendant. Even the ICTY appointed
doctors have confirmed that Mr Milosevic suffers from malignant hypertension
and a damaged heart.
We submit that the sheer volume of court documents, videos and cassettes,
that the defendant is obliged to study in such a short period of time,
will damage his health even further.
The court proceedings over the last two years have demonstrated two things.
One: that the prosecution, reliant primarily on hearsay and circumstantial
evidence, has significantly failed to prove its case on any of the charges
levelled against the defendant.
Two: that Mr Milosevic is not merely defending himself, but courageously
defending first and foremost his country and its people against a level
of propaganda and misinformation that has not been witnessed for many
decades.
In view of the above and in consideration of upholding the established
principles of international law and the reputation of the United Nations,
we respectfully request that the trial of Slobodan Milosevic be adjourned
and that he be released into an environment that would allow the defendant
the adequate time and conditions to prepare his defence and recuperate
his health.
It is our belief that in the interests of truth and justice this is the
only honourable course of action to take.
History will be a harsh judge on the people and institutions which allows
the current travesty to continue.
Yours sincerely,
Ian Johnson. UK Co-ordinator /Committee to Defend Slobodan Milosevic.
(CDSM)
Home |